Journal of Phytomedicine and Botany is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal publishing original and high-quality research in phytomedicine, medicinal plants, pharmacognosy, phytochemistry, natural products, plant sciences, and related interdisciplinary fields.
Authors are requested to read these guidelines carefully before submitting a manuscript.
Manuscripts must be original, scientifically sound, and not previously published or simultaneously submitted to another journal.
Manuscript Submission
Authors should submit manuscripts electronically to:
Email: editor@phytomedbotany.com
The corresponding author is responsible for communication with the journal and should ensure that all authors have approved the submitted manuscript.
All manuscripts are initially assessed by the editorial team for scope, quality, originality, formatting, and research-integrity requirements. Suitable manuscripts are subsequently sent for external peer review.
The journal may use plagiarism/similarity-checking software as part of its editorial quality-control process.
The final decision regarding publication rests with the Editor-in-Chief or an authorized editor, taking into consideration the peer-review reports and editorial assessment.
Manuscript Types
The journal accepts the following types of manuscripts:
Authors should select the manuscript type that best represents their work.
General Manuscript Format
All manuscripts should:
1. Original Research Articles
Original Research Articles should present novel research findings supported by appropriate methodology, analysis, and interpretation.
Manuscript structure
Tables and figures should be appropriately numbered and cited in the text.
2. Research Notes
Research Notes are intended for concise reports of focused research findings, preliminary observations, or limited but scientifically valuable studies.
Manuscript structure
The manuscript should be concise and focused on the principal research findings.
3. Review Articles
The journal accepts:
Review Articles should provide a critical and up-to-date synthesis of relevant scientific literature.
3.1 Systematic Reviews
Manuscript structure
Authors are encouraged to follow appropriate reporting guidelines such as PRISMA, where applicable.
3.2 Meta-Analyses
Manuscript structure
The statistical methods, study selection criteria, data synthesis, and relevant analyses should be clearly described.
3.3 Comprehensive Narrative Reviews
Manuscript structure
Narrative Reviews should provide a balanced and critical discussion of the available literature rather than simply listing previously published studies.
4. Short Communications
Short Communications are intended for brief reports of novel findings, important observations, preliminary results, or focused studies.
Manuscript structure
The manuscript should be concise and focused on a clearly defined research finding or observation.
5. Case Reports
Case Reports should describe scientifically or clinically significant cases relevant to phytomedicine, medicinal plants, pharmacology, toxicology, botany, or related fields.
Manuscript structure
Identifiable information concerning patients or participants should not be included without appropriate consent for publication.
6. Methodology Papers
Methodology Papers should describe new, improved, validated, or useful research methods, protocols, analytical procedures, or techniques relevant to the scope of the journal.
Manuscript structure
The methodology should be described sufficiently for readers to understand the procedure and, where appropriate, reproduce it.
7. Commentaries and Editorials
Commentaries
Commentaries should provide scholarly perspectives, critical discussions, expert viewpoints, or observations on important developments relevant to the journal.
Manuscript structure
Editorials
Editorials may be invited or commissioned by the journal.
They may address important developments in the field, emerging research areas, significant scientific issues, or matters relevant to the journal and its readership.
Editorials may follow a flexible structure according to their purpose and normally include:
Title Page
The Title Page should contain:
The title should be concise, informative, and accurately reflect the content of the manuscript.
Abstract
The abstract should be concise and accurately represent the manuscript.
For research-based manuscripts, the abstract should briefly cover:
Background – Methods – Results – Conclusion
The following maximum word limits apply:
|
Article Type |
Maximum Abstract |
|---|---|
|
Original Research Article |
300 words |
|
Research Note |
250 words |
|
Systematic Review |
300 words |
|
Meta-Analysis |
300 words |
|
Narrative Review |
300 words |
|
Short Communication |
250 words |
|
Case Report |
250 words |
|
Methodology Paper |
300 words |
|
Commentary |
250 words, where applicable |
|
Editorial |
Not normally required |
Keywords
Authors should provide 5–6 relevant keywords immediately below the abstract.
Keywords should accurately represent the major subjects of the manuscript and should facilitate indexing and discoverability.
Introduction
The Introduction should provide relevant background information, identify the research problem or knowledge gap, and clearly state the objective or purpose of the study.
Materials and Methods
The Materials and Methods section should provide sufficient information about the materials, experimental design, procedures, analytical methods, and statistical methods used in the study.
Previously published methods may be described briefly with appropriate references. New or substantially modified methods should be described in sufficient detail.
Appropriate ethical approval and regulatory information should be provided where applicable.
Results
The Results should present the findings clearly and objectively.
Tables and figures should be used where appropriate. Statistical methods should be suitable for the study design and clearly reported.
Discussion
The Discussion should interpret the findings in relation to previous research.
Authors should explain the significance of the findings and discuss relevant similarities, differences, implications, and limitations.
The Discussion should not simply repeat the Results.
Conclusion
The Conclusion should provide a concise summary of the main findings and their significance. Where appropriate, authors may include implications, recommendations, limitations, and future research directions.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments should be brief and limited to individuals or organizations that provided specific assistance, guidance, technical support, or financial support but do not qualify for authorship.
Author Contributions
Authors should clearly describe their individual contributions to the research and manuscript.
Examples may include:
All authors should have approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
Authors must disclose any financial or non-financial interests that could influence the research or its interpretation.
If no conflict exists, authors may state:
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics Approval
Where applicable, manuscripts should provide information regarding:
The name of the approving institution and approval/reference number should be provided where available.
AI Tool Usage Declaration
Authors may use AI-assisted tools for limited and appropriate purposes such as language editing, grammar correction, formatting, or improving readability.
Any substantive use of generative AI or other AI-assisted tools should be clearly and transparently disclosed in the manuscript. The disclosure should identify the AI tool and version used, its purpose, and how it was used.
AI tools cannot be listed as authors. Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, integrity, and final content of the manuscript.
Restrictions on AI-generated scientific content
The journal does not accept manuscripts in which AI tools have been used to independently interpret the research results, generate the scientific Discussion, or develop scientific conclusions without substantive author analysis and responsibility.
The journal also does not accept AI-generated citations or references. Authors are responsible for verifying every citation and reference against the original scientific source.
AI-generated text, data, interpretations, citations, or references must not be presented as the authors' own scientific work.
The journal's policy follows the principle that authors remain responsible for AI-assisted content and that AI systems cannot be credited as authors or cited as scientific sources.
Data Availability Statement
Authors should provide a Data Availability Statement, where applicable.
Where data are publicly available, authors should provide the repository name and persistent identifier or link.
Where data cannot be publicly shared because of ethical, privacy, legal, or other restrictions, the authors should briefly state the reason.
References
References should be prepared in APA format.
Authors should ensure that:
In-text Citations
For two authors, cite both authors:
(Mohali & Bhowmik, 2013)
For three or more authors, use the first author's surname followed by et al.:
(Mullar et al., 2014)
When multiple references are cited together, arrange them chronologically by year and separate them with semicolons:
(Smith, 1987; John, 1999; Moriss et al., 2000)
Authors should ensure that names and publication years in the text exactly correspond to the reference list.
Reference Examples
Journal Articles
Abusaleha, A., & Shanmugavelu, K. G. (1988). Studies on the effect of organic versus inorganic sources of nitrogen on growth, yield and quality of okra. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 45, 312–318.
Batra, V. K., Dhankhar, S. K., Bhatia, A. K., Virender, S., Arora, S. K., & Singh, V. P. (2006). Response of brinjal to foliar feeding of water soluble fertilizers. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 35(3–4).
Book – Personal Author(s)
Jackson, L. M. (2019). The psychology of prejudice: From attitudes to social action (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000168-000
Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: The biology of humans at our best and worst. Penguin Books.
Edited Book
Kesharwani, P. (Ed.). (2020). Nanotechnology based approaches for tuberculosis treatment. Academic Press.
Torino, G. C., Rivera, D. P., Capodilupo, C. M., Nadal, K. L., & Sue, D. W. (Eds.). (2019). Microaggression theory: Influence and implications. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119466642
Chapter in a Book
Author, A. A. (Year). Title of chapter. In B. B. Editor (Ed.), Title of book (pp. xxx–xxx). Publisher.
Published Proceedings Paper
Duckworth, A. L., Quirk, A., Gallop, R., Hoyle, R. H., Kelly, D. R., & Matthews, M. D. (2019). Cognitive and noncognitive predictors of success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(47), 23499–23504. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910510116
Dissertation or Thesis
Knight, A. (2001). Exercise and osteoarthritis of the knee (Unpublished master's dissertation). Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Tables and Figures
Tables and figures should be placed within the manuscript at their appropriate positions and should be numbered consecutively.
Tables
Tables should:
Figures
Figures should:
Figure legends should clearly explain the content of each figure.
Photographs and Image Quality
Photographs should be of good quality and preferably have a resolution of at least 300 dpi.
Images intended to occupy approximately one text-column width should preferably have sufficient pixel dimensions for clear reproduction.
Photographs should preferably be submitted in JPEG or TIFF format and should be provided in their original quality whenever possible.
Authors should ensure that photographs do not contain unnecessary text, labels, or identifying information.
Where photographs contain identifiable individuals, appropriate consent for publication should be obtained.
Scientific Style
Authors should follow the following conventions:
Submission Checklist
Before submitting the manuscript, authors should ensure that:
Proofs and Publication
Page proofs may be sent to the corresponding author by email before publication.
Authors should carefully check the proofs for typographical and factual errors and return corrections within 5 days of receipt.
At the proof stage, only necessary corrections should be requested. Substantial changes to the manuscript after acceptance may not be permitted.
The corresponding author is responsible for carefully checking the final proof, including:
A PDF of the published article will be made available to the corresponding author and readers through the journal website.
Copyright and Originality Declaration
Submission of a manuscript confirms that:
Copyright and licensing of published articles are governed by the journal's Copyright Policy and Open Access Policy.
Research Integrity and Ethical Responsibility
Authors are responsible for the integrity and accuracy of their submitted work.
The journal does not accept manuscripts involving:
Research involving humans or animals must comply with applicable ethical standards and institutional requirements.
Concerns relating to research misconduct will be handled according to the journal's Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement.
Editorial and Peer Review Process
Manuscripts that meet the journal's basic requirements and fall within its scope are sent for external peer review.
Research manuscripts are normally reviewed by at least two independent reviewers with appropriate expertise.
The journal follows a double-anonymous peer-review process.
Authors may suggest potential reviewers, but the final selection of reviewers remains entirely at the discretion of the editorial team.
The possible editorial decisions are:
The Editor-in-Chief or authorized editor makes the final editorial decision.
The same editorial and external peer-review standards apply to articles published as part of special issues, where applicable.
Correspondence
All correspondence concerning manuscript submission, peer review, revision, and publication should be directed to:
Editorial Office
Journal of Phytomedicine and Botany
Email: editor@phytomedbotany.com